IntelliJ probably replaced this

Comment is trivial and can be derived from the code context. The status check above clearly indicates this is for BEHIND or DIVERGED cases.

Commented code should be removed as per project guidelines. Git history should be used instead of keeping debug hints in comments.

Will remove in the end

Maybe name this aliceGit to be consistent with @BeforeEach

I thought about it, I think private Git git was from an earlier test setup. Later on, aliceGit was introduced and assigned to it, which made the git field redundant. Now I removed it and consistently use aliceGit, bobGit, and remoteGit to clearly distinguish the roles of each repository

I think, this was OK.

Maybe, you need to close aliceGit at the end of the method.

Comment is trivial and only describes what the code does without adding any additional information or reasoning. The operations are self-evident from the code that follows.

Wrapping exceptions in RuntimeException loses the specific error context and makes error handling less effective. Should use more specific exception handling.

The operation might be long-running and should use BackgroundTask instead of direct execution to prevent UI freezing during Git operations.

Using ArrayList constructor directly instead of modern Java collections. Consider using List.of() for initial empty list creation to follow modern Java practices.

But mutable list is required here, cannot use List.of()

Comment does not add new information and simply restates what is obvious from the code. Such comments should be removed.

The record fields lack validation to ensure none of the BibEntry parameters can be null. This could lead to NullPointerExceptions during conflict resolution operations.

Method should return Optional instead of potentially null BibDatabaseContext to follow modern Java practices for null safety.

result.getDatabaseContext() ensures that null values are never returned

Comment provides no additional information beyond what can be inferred from the code and test location. It should be removed as it doesn't add value or reasoning.

Method returns String which could be null. Modern Java practices suggest using Optional for potentially null returns to make the API more explicit.

Synchronizing on a parameter object is dangerous as it can lead to deadlocks if the same object is used elsewhere. Consider using a private final lock object or more fine-grained synchronization.

Comments are trivial and only restate what is obvious from the code itself. They don't provide additional information about the reasoning or implementation details.

Parameters should be validated for null values since they represent critical commit references. The record should include validation in a compact constructor to prevent null values.

Comment restates what's obvious from the code without providing additional insight or reasoning behind the operation.

Method parameters should be validated for null values before use. Currently there are no null checks which could lead to NullPointerException during execution.

Using Object.clone() is discouraged as per Effective Java. Should implement a proper copy constructor or factory method instead to ensure proper object copying.

The SUCCESS constant should be declared as final since it's a static field that represents an immutable state. This follows Java best practices for constant values.

Comments for enum values are trivial and simply restate what can be derived from the enum names. These comments don't provide additional information about implementation details or reasoning.